support data
- North America > United States > Virginia (0.04)
- North America > United States > Michigan (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Information Technology > Security & Privacy (0.46)
- Health & Medicine > Diagnostic Medicine > Imaging (0.46)
- North America > United States > Virginia (0.04)
- North America > United States > Michigan (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Information Technology > Security & Privacy (0.46)
- Health & Medicine > Diagnostic Medicine > Imaging (0.46)
- North America > United States > Maryland (0.04)
- North America > Canada (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
Transfer learning with a deeper backbone: We have now tested transfer learning with an adversarially trained
We thank the reviewers for their insightful comments. A number of additional experiments were suggested. We have updated our paper to include these results. For example, our adversarially queried R2-D2 model achieves 35.53% robust 5-shot Out-of-distribution testing: We have now evaluated our models on Meta-Dataset. For the same models, on the CUB-200 dataset, the robust accuracies are 29 .04%
- Asia > China > Guangdong Province > Shenzhen (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
- Asia > China > Zhejiang Province (0.04)
- Asia > China > Heilongjiang Province > Harbin (0.04)
- Information Technology > Sensing and Signal Processing > Image Processing (0.94)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Vision (0.70)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks (0.46)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Statistical Learning (0.46)
Mind the Gap Between Prototypes and Images in Cross-domain Finetuning
In cross-domain few-shot classification (CFC), recent works mainly focus on adapting a simple transformation head on top of a frozen pre-trained backbone with few labeled data to project embeddings into a task-specific metric space where classification can be performed by measuring similarities between image instance and prototype representations.
Dynamic Lagging for Time-Series Forecasting in E-Commerce Finance: Mitigating Information Loss with A Hybrid ML Architecture
Sharma, Abhishek, Parush, Anat, Wadhwa, Sumit, Savir, Amihai, Guinard, Anne, Srivastava, Prateek
Accurate forecasting in the e-commerce finance domain is particularly challenging due to irregular invoice schedules, payment deferrals, and user-specific behavioral variability. These factors, combined with sparse datasets and short historical windows, limit the effectiveness of conventional time-series methods. While deep learning and Transformer-based models have shown promise in other domains, their performance deteriorates under partial observability and limited historical data. To address these challenges, we propose a hybrid forecasting framework that integrates dynamic lagged feature engineering and adaptive rolling-window representations with classical statistical models and ensemble learners. Our approach explicitly incorporates invoice-level behavioral modeling, structured lag of support data, and custom stability-aware loss functions, enabling robust forecasts in sparse and irregular financial settings. Empirical results demonstrate an approximate 5% reduction in MAPE compared to baseline models, translating into substantial financial savings. Furthermore, the framework enhances forecast stability over quarterly horizons and strengthens feature target correlation by capturing both short- and long-term patterns, leveraging user profile attributes, and simulating upcoming invoice behaviors. These findings underscore the value of combining structured lagging, invoice-level closure modeling, and behavioral insights to advance predictive accuracy in sparse financial time-series forecasting.
- North America > United States > Virginia (0.04)
- North America > United States > Michigan (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Information Technology > Security & Privacy (0.46)
- Health & Medicine > Diagnostic Medicine > Imaging (0.46)
- North America > United States > Virginia (0.04)
- North America > United States > Michigan (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Information Technology > Security & Privacy (0.46)
- Health & Medicine > Diagnostic Medicine > Imaging (0.46)